Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Surgical approach in lumbar spine tuberculosis, which is best? A meta-analysis

  • Irsa Rahardjo ,
  • I Ketut Martiana ,
  • Budi Utomo ,

Abstract

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/ZORIuJI9O2I

 

Introduction: Lumbar spine is the area with the maximum spinal load, great shearing force and the stress concentration points with high range of motion. Proper surgical approach in lumbar spinal TB will not only affect the biomechanical outcome but also the surgical outcome. Therefore, this study aims to analyze which of the two most commonly used approach, posterior or combined approach, is best for lumbar spinal TB

Methods: Studies comparing surgical approach of lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis by single posterior approach versus combined anterior and posterior approach were identified in a literature search conducted from study inception to February 2023. Visual analog score (VAS), Cobb angle, Lordotic angle, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Erithrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, complication, and time of bone graft fusion was analyzed.

Results: In total, 855 studies were found from the search engines. From screening, 10 studies were finally included for the final quantitative analysis. No difference in VAS (p=0.87) and cobb angle difference (p=0.65) were found from the two studies. Better outcome for combined approach was found in terms of ESR decreasing (p=0.02), and time of bone graft fusion (p=0.09). Meanwhile, better outcome for posterior approach was found on lordotic angle (p=0.02), surgical time (p<0.05), intraoperative bleeding (p<0.05), and complication rate.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that posterior approach on one or two level of lumbar spinal TB enables better lordotic correction angle, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, and complication incidence compared to combined approach.

References

  1. Rajasekaran S, Soundararajan DCR, Shetty AP, Kanna RM. Spinal tuberculosis: Current concepts. Glob Spine J. 2018;8:96S-108S.
  2. Kemenkes RI. Strategi Nasional Penanggulangan Tuberkulosis di Indonesia 2020-2024. Pertem Konsolidasi Nas Penyusunan STRANAS TB. 2020;135.
  3. Wang X, Pang X, Wu P, Luo C, Shen X. One-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation vs. single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(4):830–7.
  4. Zhang HQ, Li M, Wang YX, Tang MX, Guo CF, Liu SH, et al. Minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes for comparison between titanium mesh cage and allogeneic bone graft to reconstruct anterior column through posterior approach for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with kyphosis. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e407–15.
  5. Zhang H, Guo Q, Guo C, Wu J, Liu J, Gao Q, et al. A medium-term follow-up of adult lumbar tuberculosis treating with 3 surgical approaches. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(45):e8574.
  6. Liu JM, Chen XY, Zhou Y, Long XH, Chen WZ, Liu ZL, et al. Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis? A retrospective case-control study. Med (United States). 2016;95(35):1–7.
  7. Shen X, Huang X, Xiao S, Liu H, Zhang Y, Xiang T, et al. Surgical treatment of selected patients with multilevel contiguous thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis by only posterior instrumentation without any bone fusion. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(10):18611–9.
  8. Zhang H, Guo Q, Liu S, Guo C, Gao Q, Tang M. Comparison of mid-term outcomes of posterior or postero-anterior approach using different bone grafting in children with lumbar tuberculosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(10):e14760.
  9. Zeng H, Wang X, Pang X, Luo C, Zhang P, Peng W, et al. Posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches in surgical management of lumbosacral tuberculosis with paraspinal abscess in adults. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40(5):607–16.
  10. Liu Z, Zhang P, Li W, Xu Z, Wang X. Posterior-only vs. combined posterior-anterior approaches in treating lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: A retrospective study with minimum 7-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):1–11.
  11. Xu Z, Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang Y, Wu Y. Medium-term follow-up outcomes of one-stage posterior lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation in the management of lumbosacral junction tuberculosis in adults. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(7):2051–60.
  12. Xu Z, Wang X, Shen X, Luo C, Zeng H, Zhang P, et al. Posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches for lower lumbar tuberculous spondylitis with neurological deficits in the aged. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(6):482–7.
  13. Shen J, Zheng Q, Wang Y, Ying X. One-stage combined anterior-posterior surgery for thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(1):54–61.
  14. Cui Y. Comparative study of a single posterior approach and combined posterior-anterior approach for patients with lower lumbar tuberculosis [Preprint]. 2020;1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-48386/v1
  15. Zhang H, Lin M, Li J, Tang M, Guo C, Wu J, et al. One-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation in treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(3):333–41.
  16. Zhang X, Ji J, Liu B. Management of spinal tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(5):1395–407.
  17. Liu P, Sun M, Li S, Wang Z, Ding G. A retrospective controlled study of three different operative approaches for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis: Three years of follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;128:25–34.

How to Cite

Rahardjo, I., Martiana, I. K., & Utomo, B. (2024). Surgical approach in lumbar spine tuberculosis, which is best? A meta-analysis. Bali Medical Journal, 13(1), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v13i1.5074

HTML
8

Total
3

Share

Search Panel